Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Seyboth Wild vs N. Fatic

Thiago Seyboth Wild

BRA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

214

C. Rank

206

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$973.8K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

214

C. Rank

206

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$973.8K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Wild 2 - 0 Fatic

They have played 5 sets in total, with Thiago Seyboth Wild winning 4 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Thiago Seyboth Wild and Nerman Fatic was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 28-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-1 7-6(5).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wild	2
Fatic	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q3) Mauthausen Challenger(04-28-25)

Stats

Thiago Seyboth Wild

Nerman Fatic

(R1) Turkey F39 (Antalya)(10-18-17)

Stats

Thiago Seyboth Wild

Nerman Fatic

T. S. Wild vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

T. S. Wild	Stats	N. Fatic
$973,785	Career Prize Money	$73,995
54.56% (257-214)	Career Total W/L	58.49% (403-286)
2	Clay	0
9	Titles	12
2	Total H2H Matches	0
37.50% (6-10)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

T. S. Wild vs N. Fatic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thiago Seyboth Wild has won 44.68% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thiago Seyboth Wild, in recent form, has won 46.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.98% and 28.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Thiago Seyboth Wild has saved 59.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Thiago Seyboth Wild has won 35.71% of matches played (W/L 15/27), with Nerman Fatic winning 75.00% (W/L 51/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Thiago Seyboth Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 212/158), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/10). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Thiago Seyboth Wild has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 6/12), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Thiago Seyboth Wild winning 2 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Thiago Seyboth Wild winning 4 and Nerman Fatic winning 1.
The last match between Thiago Seyboth Wild and Nerman Fatic was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 28-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-1 7-6(5).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:36.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thiago Seyboth Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.17 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 346.71.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thiago Seyboth Wild has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 89% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Thiago Seyboth Wild has converted 32.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 35.90% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. S. Wild vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. S. Wild	Stats	N. Fatic
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
31	Games Won	18
6	Aces (Total)	8
10	Total Double Faults	11
1:57:36	Average Match Time	1:57:36
56% (85/153)	1st Serve %	73% (111/153)
74% (63/85)	1st Serve Win %	64% (71/111)
57% (39/68)	2nd Serve Win %	33% (14/42)
60% (9/15)	Break Pts Won %	50% (3/6)
44% (68/153)	Return Points Win %	33% (51/153)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. S. Wild Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Cali Challenger - 06-10-2025
R1 Daniel Dutra Da SilvaD. Dutra	L	7-6(3) 6-4	Stats
Braga Challenger - 29-09-2025
R1 Carlos TabernerC. Taberner	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Lisbon Challenger - 22-09-2025
R1 Roberto Carballes BaenaR. Carballes	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger - 15-09-2025
R1 Vit KoprivaV. Kopriva	L	6-3 3-6 7-6(1)	Stats
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, GRE-BRA 1-3 - 08-09-2025
Rubber 2 Stefanos TsitsipasS. Tsitsipas	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
QF Hugo GrenierH. Grenier	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Carlo Alberto CaniatoC. Alberto	W	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

T. S. Wild vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. S. Wild	Stats	N. Fatic
54.56% (257/214)	YTD Win/Loss	58.49% (403/286)
54.50% (605/505)	Sets Win/Loss	57.51% (888/656)
51.89% (5520/5117)	Games Win/Loss	53.04% (7574/6706)
45.83% (33/39)	Hard Win/Loss	51.19% (43/41)
57.30% (212/158)	Clay Win/Loss	61.00% (341/218)
41.18% (7/10)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.18% (19/25)
41.67% (5/7)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.38	Aces Per Game	0.23
1973	Aces Total	1568
0.25	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
1312	Total Double Faults	1510
1:44:44	Average Match Time	1:19:52
357.18	Average Opponent Rank	509.74
61% (19814/32263)	1st Serve %	66% (23679/35628)
70% (13841/19814)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15504/23679)
51% (6329/12449)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5733/11949)
41% (1251/3069)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1961/4201)
39% (12598/32375)	Return Points Win %	43% (15552/35990)
35.48% (11/20)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
60.00% (18/12)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
20.00% (1/4)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
44.44% (40/50)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
56.30% (134/104)	Challenger W/L	52.91% (118/105)
69.74% (53/23)	Futures W/L	63.24% (277/161)
56% (250/450)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (394/661)
25% (4/16)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
48% (78/163)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/156)
45% (67/148)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (102/188)
83% (274/227)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (393/347)
17% (274/47)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (393/42)
15% (197/30)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (296/57)